[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110119141334.GA2544@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:14:02 -0500
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
To: Liuwenyi <qingshenlwy@...il.com>
Cc: strongzgy@...il.com, onlyflyer@...il.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
miaox@...fujitsu.com, josef@...hat.com, chris.mason@...cle.com,
Yang Ruirui <ruirui.r.yang@...to.com>, meego-kernel@...go.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid a NULL pointer in btrfs
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:08:13PM +0800, Liuwenyi wrote:
> In Yang Ruirui's mail, the btrfs will create a oops. This is caused by a
> null pointer in test_range_bit() while lock the spinlock.
>
> So, It is necessary to add a pointer check into test_range_bit()
>
NAK, the tree shouldn't be null coming into this function, something else is
going wrong. What oops is this? Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists