linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for January 18 (__modver_version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D370CE6.3000505@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:10:14 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 18 (__modver_version_show)

On 01/18/11 21:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:17:49 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm seeing this on several builds (i386 and x86_64):
>>
>> lib/built-in.o:(__modver+0x8): undefined reference to `__modver_version_show'
>> lib/built-in.o:(__modver+0x2c): undefined reference to `__modver_version_show'
>>
>> It looks like the compiler or linker is dropping that function from the
>> build since it cannot see any references to it...
>> At least __modver_version_show is not in the kernel/params.o file.
> 
> Do these builds have CONFIG_SYSFS set?
> 

Yes, they all do (50 random builds have CONFIG_SYSFS=y).

-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/