| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4D370D63.5070503@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:12:19 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 18 (__modver_version_show) On 01/19/11 08:10, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/18/11 21:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Randy, >> >> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:17:49 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'm seeing this on several builds (i386 and x86_64): >>> >>> lib/built-in.o:(__modver+0x8): undefined reference to `__modver_version_show' >>> lib/built-in.o:(__modver+0x2c): undefined reference to `__modver_version_show' >>> >>> It looks like the compiler or linker is dropping that function from the >>> build since it cannot see any references to it... >>> At least __modver_version_show is not in the kernel/params.o file. >> >> Do these builds have CONFIG_SYSFS set? >> > > Yes, they all do (50 random builds have CONFIG_SYSFS=y). Gawd, what bad grepping this morning. You hit the nail. They do not have SYSFS enabled. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists