lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:41:59 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
Cc:	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...e.hu, jaxboe@...ionio.com,
	npiggin@...il.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] smp_call_function_many SMP race

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:07:25 -0600
Milton Miller <miltonm@....com> wrote:

> I noticed a failure where we hit the following WARN_ON in
> generic_smp_call_function_interrupt:
> 
>                 if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, data->cpumask))
>                         continue;
> 
>                 data->csd.func(data->csd.info);
> 
>                 refs = atomic_dec_return(&data->refs);
>                 WARN_ON(refs < 0);      <-------------------------
> 
> We atomically tested and cleared our bit in the cpumask, and yet the
> number of cpus left (ie refs) was 0. How can this be?
> 
> It turns out commit 54fdade1c3332391948ec43530c02c4794a38172
> (generic-ipi: make struct call_function_data lockless)
> is at fault. It removes locking from smp_call_function_many and in
> doing so creates a rather complicated race.

I've been waving https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23042 at
the x86 guys for a while now, to no avail.  Do you think you just fixed
it?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ