[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1295484358.15213.25.camel@yhuang-dev>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:45:58 +0800
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v10 0/4] Lock-less list
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 05:55 +0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'm trying to remember why we're talking about this.
>
> You had an ACPI-based "hardware error reporting" thing. And that
> required an nmi-context memory allocator. And that required a
> "lockless" list implementation.
>
> Yes?
Yes. But the "lockless" list implementation is general, it can be used
by other part of kernel too, such as irq_work and xlist in
net/rds/xlist.h in the patchset.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists