[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110120121455.GA7680@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:14:55 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v10 0/4] Lock-less list
* huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com> wrote:
> > But will all that stuff be accepted? Please stop sending infrastructure bits and
> > focus on your larger RAS picture, once you have consensus on that from all
> > parties involved, then, and only then, does it make sense to submit everything,
> > including infrastructure.
>
> I am not sending hardware error reporting infrastructure. As far as I know, Linus
> and Andrew suggest to use printk for hardware error reporting. And now, I just
> try to write APEI driver and reporting hardware error with printk. Is it
> acceptable? Do you have some other idea about hardware error reporting?
Erm, how could you possible have missed the perf based RAS daemon work of Boris,
which we've pointed out about half a dozen times already?
It's somewhat annoying that you simply ignore repeated feedback and feign ignorance.
Reminds me of someone :-)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists