[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110120191341.GB4701@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:13:41 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
Cc: djwong@...ibm.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Keith Mannthey <kmannth@...ibm.com>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7.1] block: Coordinate flush requests
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 07:50:57PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:12:55AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > This makes sense. would it possible N flush data payloads delay the
> > first request?
>
> I ended up with a different design. Still buggy. It triggers a weird
> oops under stress test but other than that things generally seem to
> work as expected. Please read the comment at the top of blk-flush.c
> for more info. I'll post properly after more testing and debugging.
The oops was caused by debugging code I put in (not posted together).
It runs fine without it, so if you have some time, please give it a
spin.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists