[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1101211002490.13919@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:11:44 +1100 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Debora Velarde <debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@...rix.com>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: fix panic caused by "tpm: Autodetect itpm
devices"
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Rajiv Andrade wrote:
> On 01/20/2011 03:37 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > Are all TPM maintainers MIA? This is a trivial patch that fixes a
> > panic, and it was a late-added regression in 2.6.37.
> >
> Not myself. I missed this one unfortunately in my work queue, sorry, will keep
> alert to avoid this happening again.
>
> Acked-by: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Rajiv,
I've mentioned this at least once before: as maintainer of TPM, ideally,
what you should be doing is collecting the TPM patches, testing them in
your own tree, then pushing them to me with an indication of where they
need to end up (e.g. bugfixes for current linus vs. next), preferably via
git.
This is a significant part of what distinguishes maintainership from
simply developing or reviewing code.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists