[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinQ4sczEwZYCk1_tLmeJyjyXj4TVoSZbjg+KiRq@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:18:14 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com, mingo@...e.hu,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> +static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> +
> + /*
> + * Ensure the task's vruntime is normalized, so that when its
> + * switched back to the fair class the enqueue_entity(.flags=0) will
> + * do the right thing.
> + *
> + * If it was on_rq, then the dequeue_entity(.flags=0) will already
> + * have normalized the vruntime, if it was !on_rq, then only when
> + * the task is sleeping will it still have non-normalized vruntime.
> + */
> + if (!se->on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
> + se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
Here it's possible that se->vruntime is little than cfs_rq->min_vruntime.
Thanks,
Yong
--
Only stand for myself
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists