[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin62OMHm7haO5EHJY4-ngaTkUdg=t058LhknA0D@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:27:07 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com, mingo@...e.hu,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex
on Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>> +static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>> +{
>> + struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
>> + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Ensure the task's vruntime is normalized, so that when its
>> + * switched back to the fair class the enqueue_entity(.flags=0) will
>> + * do the right thing.
>> + *
>> + * If it was on_rq, then the dequeue_entity(.flags=0) will already
>> + * have normalized the vruntime, if it was !on_rq, then only when
>> + * the task is sleeping will it still have non-normalized vruntime.
>> + */
>> + if (!se->on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
>> + se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
>
> Here it's possible that se->vruntime is little than cfs_rq->min_vruntime.
Maybe we can:
place_entity(cfs_rq, se, 0);
se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists