[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1295652102.2148.314.camel@pasglop>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:21:42 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@...gle.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Uwe Kleine-K??nig <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Locking in the clk API
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:28 -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
> Clocks that have a voltage dependency, or depend on a clock that has a
> voltage dependency, are non-atomic, everything else is atomic. PLLs
> are atomic because they lock very fast (300 uS or 1ms)
Some could argue that this is still way too slow for atomic context :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists