[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D3A1695.7020707@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:28:21 -0800
From: Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
CC: Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Uwe Kleine-K??nig <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Locking in the clk API
On 01/21/2011 01:53 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
...
> And... is there really some advantage to turn the clock off in between
> frames when you're otherwise busy generating them anyway?
For aggressive power management where supported by HW, yes.
- Bryan
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists