[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110122.230956.176521815.ryusuke@osrg.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:09:56 +0900 (JST)
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
To: wakko@...mx.eu.org
Cc: linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NILFS crash on 2.6.37
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:57:48 -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:37:38 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> > > (Cc'ed to linux-nilfs)
> > Does the following patch fix your problem?
>
> > diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/super.c b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> > index 0994f6a7..58fd707 100644
> > --- a/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> > @@ -704,7 +704,8 @@ skip_mount_setup:
> > sbp[0]->s_state =
> > cpu_to_le16(le16_to_cpu(sbp[0]->s_state) & ~NILFS_VALID_FS);
> > /* synchronize sbp[1] with sbp[0] */
> > - memcpy(sbp[1], sbp[0], nilfs->ns_sbsize);
> > + if (sbp[1])
> > + memcpy(sbp[1], sbp[0], nilfs->ns_sbsize);
> > return nilfs_commit_super(sbi, NILFS_SB_COMMIT_ALL);
> > }
>
> That patch fix it. Just a note, the 2.6.37 vanilla source was about 20
> lines up from 704
Thanks for testing. Will send upstream and to stable.
> > > > [ 1202.581501] NILFS warning: broken superblock. using spare superblock.
> > > > [ 1202.582093] NILFS warning: broken superblock. using spare superblock.
>
> Why does it say this 2 times? Just curious.
Because each super block is read twice in different block sizes.
Well, indeed it looks confusing. I'll try to do something.
Ryusuke Konishi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists