[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110122015748.GA3174@animx.eu.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:57:48 -0500
From: Wakko Warner <wakko@...mx.eu.org>
To: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NILFS crash on 2.6.37
Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:37:38 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> > (Cc'ed to linux-nilfs)
> > > [ 1202.581501] NILFS warning: broken superblock. using spare superblock.
> > > [ 1202.582093] NILFS warning: broken superblock. using spare superblock.
Why does it say this 2 times? Just curious.
> > Thanks for the report.
> >
> > This seems to be a regression on 2.6.36 which could happen when one of
> > two superblocks is broken.
> >
> > I'll fix it.
>
> Does the following patch fix your problem?
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/super.c b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> index 0994f6a7..58fd707 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> @@ -704,7 +704,8 @@ skip_mount_setup:
> sbp[0]->s_state =
> cpu_to_le16(le16_to_cpu(sbp[0]->s_state) & ~NILFS_VALID_FS);
> /* synchronize sbp[1] with sbp[0] */
> - memcpy(sbp[1], sbp[0], nilfs->ns_sbsize);
> + if (sbp[1])
> + memcpy(sbp[1], sbp[0], nilfs->ns_sbsize);
> return nilfs_commit_super(sbi, NILFS_SB_COMMIT_ALL);
> }
That patch fix it. Just a note, the 2.6.37 vanilla source was about 20
lines up from 704
--
Microsoft has beaten Volkswagen's world record. Volkswagen only created 22
million bugs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists