[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1295957745.28776.723.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:15:45 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
SystemTap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2.6.37-rc5-tip 5/20] 5: Uprobes:
register/unregister probes.
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 15:28 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> +void unregister_uprobe(struct inode *inode, unsigned long offset,
> + struct uprobe_consumer *consumer)
> +{
> + struct prio_tree_iter iter;
> + struct list_head tmp_list;
> + struct address_space *mapping;
> + struct mm_struct *mm, *tmpmm;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct uprobe *uprobe;
> +
> + if (!inode || !consumer)
> + return;
> +
> + uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
> + if (!uprobe) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "No uprobe found with inode:offset %p %lu\n",
> + inode, offset);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!del_consumer(uprobe, consumer)) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "No uprobe found with consumer %p\n",
> + consumer);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp_list);
> +
> + mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&uprobes_mutex);
> + if (uprobe->consumers)
> + goto put_unlock;
> +
> + spin_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
> + vma_prio_tree_foreach(vma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, 0, 0) {
> + if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&vma->vm_mm->mm_users))
> + continue;
> +
> + mm = vma->vm_mm;
> +
> + if (!atomic_read(&mm->uprobes_count)) {
> + mmput(mm);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (valid_vma(vma)) {
> + list_add(&mm->uprobes_list, &tmp_list);
> + mm->uprobes_vaddr = vma->vm_start + offset;
> + } else
> + mmput(mm);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(mm, tmpmm, &tmp_list, uprobes_list) {
> + remove_uprobe(mm, uprobe);
> + list_del(&mm->uprobes_list);
> + mmput(mm);
> + }
> +
> + if (atomic_read(&uprobe->ref) == 1) {
> + synchronize_sched();
> + rb_erase(&uprobe->rb_node, &uprobes_tree);
How is that safe without holding the treelock?
> + iput(uprobe->inode);
> + }
> +
> +put_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&uprobes_mutex);
> + put_uprobe(uprobe);
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists