linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 20/32] video/msm_fb: use system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110125134558.GY27510@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:45:58 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/32] video/msm_fb: use system_wq instead of dedicated
 workqueues

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:10:45AM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 18:06 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:49:43PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason to use separate workqueues.  Drop
> > > msmfb_info->resume_workqueue and use system_wq instead.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl>
> > I'm not the right person, CC according to MAINTAINERS
> 
> ARM/QUALCOMM MSM MACHINE SUPPORT
> M:      David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
> M:      Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
> M:      Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>

Oops, sorry about that.  So how does the patch look?  Are you gonna
take it through msm tree or shall I take it?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/