linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/32] arm/omap: use system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110125134722.GZ27510@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:47:22 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	"Kanigeri, Hari" <h-kanigeri2@...com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] arm/omap: use system_wq in mailbox

On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:24:21AM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Using dedicated workqueue or system_wq doesn't make any difference in
> terms of execution latency anymore.  Sleeping work items no longer
> delay execution of other work items.  If mailbox is very latency
> sensitive, it might make sense to create a HIGHPRI workqueue but that
> usually isn't necessary.

Ping.  Shall I apply the patch?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/