linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110125141942.GA27510@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:19:42 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Todd Fischer <todd.fischer@...gerun.com>
Cc:	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of
 dedicated workqueue

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 09:34:43AM -0700, Todd Fischer wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Polling is only necessary because I was given brain dead hardware.
> I was expecting updated hardware with the interrupt signal connected
> properly, but haven't received it yet.
> 
> Any reasonable hardware will not need tps6507x-ts polling.  I was
> under the impression I could only push patches that I have tested.
> Since I haven't tested an interrupt version of the driver, I didn't
> include a patch that removes the polling and replaces it with
> interrupts.
> 
> I have another customer planning on using the TPS6507x chip for
> touch screen.  I expect their hardware in around 3 weeks.

Shall I apply the patch?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/