linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] firmware_classs: change val uevent's type to bool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <C5C86A19469DAE48AAAD0E5F3716E44501D6329795@irsmsx504.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:23:39 +0000
From:	"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>
To:	Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"chrisw@...s-sol.org" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
	"dmitry.torokhov@...il.com" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	"gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] firmware_classs: change val uevent's type to bool


________________________________________
From: Bob Liu [lliubbo@...il.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:03
To: Berg, Johannes
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; chrisw@...s-sol.org; Winkler, Tomas; dmitry.torokhov@...il.com; gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware_classs: change val uevent's type to bool

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Berg, Johannes <johannes.berg@...el.com> wrote:
> @@ -463,7 +463,8 @@ fw_create_instance(struct firmware *firmware, const char *fw_name,
>        f_dev->parent = device;
>        f_dev->class = &firmware_class;
>
> -       dev_set_uevent_suppress(f_dev, true);
> +       if (uevent)
> +               dev_set_uevent_suppress(f_dev, true);
>
> Everything but this is a no-op basically, but you didn't even describe this change?
>


Hmm.. Sorry for that, but I mentioned that by "fix a place missing
uevent check".
I added this check because I think it should be paired with following
dev_set_uevent_suppress(f_dev, false).

I don't think it should -- if you don't want uevents, then they should _always_ be suppressed, right?

johannes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland 
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/