[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5936.1296039791@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:03:11 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...ito.it>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
keyrings@...ux-nfs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, safford@...son.ibm.com,
ramunno@...ito.it, tyhicks@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
kirkland@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 3/6] encrypted-keys: add key format support
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...ito.it> wrote:
> This patch introduces a new parameter, called 'format', that defines the
> format of data stored by encrypted keys. The 'default' format identifies
> encrypted keys containing only the symmetric key, while other formats can
> be defined to support additional information. The 'format' parameter is
> written in the datablob produced by commands 'keyctl print' or
> 'keyctl pipe' and is integrity protected by the HMAC.
Would it make more sense to take key=val pairs where you have the <format>
parameter? Then you could have a format=default|foo|whatever argument and
you'd leave room for future addition of qualifiers.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists