linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] oom: handle overflow in mem_cgroup_out_of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110126170713.GA2401@cmpxchg.org>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:07:13 +0100
From:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: handle overflow in mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:29:15AM -0800, Greg Thelen wrote:
> mem_cgroup_get_limit() returns a byte limit as a unsigned 64 bit value,
> which is converted to a page count by mem_cgroup_out_of_memory().  Prior
> to this patch the conversion could overflow on 32 bit platforms
> yielding a limit of zero.

Balbir: It can truncate, because the conversion shrinks the required
bits of this 64-bit number by only PAGE_SHIFT (12).  Trying to store
the resulting up to 52 significant bits in a 32-bit integer will cut
up to 20 significant bits off.

> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
> ---
>  mm/oom_kill.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 7dcca55..3fcac51 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  	struct task_struct *p;
>  
>  	check_panic_on_oom(CONSTRAINT_MEMCG, gfp_mask, 0, NULL);
> -	limit = mem_cgroup_get_limit(mem) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	limit = min(mem_cgroup_get_limit(mem) >> PAGE_SHIFT, (u64)ULONG_MAX);

I would much prefer using min_t(u64, ...).  To make it really, really
explicit that this is 64-bit arithmetic.  But that is just me, no
correctness issue.

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/