lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4D41AE51020000780002ED8F@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:41:37 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To:	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>, <fanhenglong@...wei.com>,
	"Kaushik Barde" <kbarde@...wei.com>,
	"Kenneth Lee" <liguozhu@...wei.com>,
	"linqaingmin" <linqiangmin@...wei.com>, <wangzhenguo@...wei.com>,
	"Xiaowei Yang" <xiaowei.yang@...wei.com>,
	"Wu Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: One (possible) x86 get_user_pages bug

>>> On 27.01.11 at 17:25, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 16:07 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> 
>> Nick, based on your doing of the initial implementation, would
>> you be able to estimate whether disabling get_user_pages_fast()
>> altogether for Xen would be performing measurably worse than
>> adding the locks (but continuing to avoid acquiring mm->mmap_sem)
>> as suggested by Xiaowei? That's of course only if the latter is correct
>> at all, of which I haven't fully convinced myself yet. 
> 
> Adding the lock will result in deadlocks, __get_user_pages_fast() is
> used from NMI context.
> 
> Then again, I've got no clue if Xen even has NMIs..

It does, but not in a way that would be usable for perf events
afaict, so that code path should be dead under Xen. (We don't
even build the offending source file in our kernels, but I'm not
sure how pv-ops deals with situations like this - Jeremy?)

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ