linux-kernel - Re: timerfd incompatibility on mips

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101271651250.30861@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:53:39 -0800 (PST)
From:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To:	Alexander Gordeev <lasaine@....cs.msu.su>
cc:	uClibc <uclibc@...ibc.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: timerfd incompatibility on mips

On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Alexander Gordeev wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> I've just found a problem with TFD_NONBLOCK flag that can be passed to
> timerfd_create.
> 
> <uclibc>/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/sys/timerfd.h which is installed
> to /usr/include/sys/timerfd.h defines TFD_NONBLOCK as 04000 ie 0x800.
> BTW glibc/eglibc headers do the same thing.
> 
> <linux>/include/linux/timerfd.h declares it as O_NONBLOCK which is
> defined in fcntl.h. Usually O_NONBLOCK is 0x800 too but some
> architectures including MIPS it redefine it:
> 
> arch/mips/include/asm/fcntl.h:#define O_NONBLOCK	0x0080
> arch/alpha/include/asm/fcntl.h:#define O_NONBLOCK	00004
> arch/sparc/include/asm/fcntl.h:#define O_NONBLOCK	0x4000
> arch/parisc/include/asm/fcntl.h:#define O_NONBLOCK	000200004
> 
> My tests show that kernel thinks that TFD_NONBLOCK is 0x80 on MIPS. I
> get what I want when I pass 0x80 and EINVAL when I pass 0x800. I don't
> know why there are such uncertain things in Linux. Probably the problem
> should be fixed in the kernel.
> 
> Right now one cannot use timerfd_create(..., TFD_NONBLOCK) on MIPS but
> can use timerfd_create(..., O_NONBLOCK) instead.

Ther kernel definition (include/linux/timerfd.h) maps it directly to 
O_NONBLOCK, but I am noticing that glibc bolt in the value.
I don't think this is a kernel fix.


- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/