[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110128032443.6f8b877e@apollo.gnet>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 03:24:43 +0300
From: Alexander Gordeev <lasaine@....cs.msu.su>
To: uClibc <uclibc@...ibc.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: timerfd incompatibility on mips
Hi!
I've just found a problem with TFD_NONBLOCK flag that can be passed to
timerfd_create.
<uclibc>/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/sys/timerfd.h which is installed
to /usr/include/sys/timerfd.h defines TFD_NONBLOCK as 04000 ie 0x800.
BTW glibc/eglibc headers do the same thing.
<linux>/include/linux/timerfd.h declares it as O_NONBLOCK which is
defined in fcntl.h. Usually O_NONBLOCK is 0x800 too but some
architectures including MIPS it redefine it:
arch/mips/include/asm/fcntl.h:#define O_NONBLOCK 0x0080
arch/alpha/include/asm/fcntl.h:#define O_NONBLOCK 00004
arch/sparc/include/asm/fcntl.h:#define O_NONBLOCK 0x4000
arch/parisc/include/asm/fcntl.h:#define O_NONBLOCK 000200004
My tests show that kernel thinks that TFD_NONBLOCK is 0x80 on MIPS. I
get what I want when I pass 0x80 and EINVAL when I pass 0x800. I don't
know why there are such uncertain things in Linux. Probably the problem
should be fixed in the kernel.
Right now one cannot use timerfd_create(..., TFD_NONBLOCK) on MIPS but
can use timerfd_create(..., O_NONBLOCK) instead.
--
Alexander
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists