[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110127174801.c22d693b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:48:01 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>
Cc: dsterba@...e.cz, mfasheh@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] fs/ocfs2/dlm: Use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:28:53 -0800 Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com> wrote:
> > return status;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1077,6 +1069,7 @@ static int dlm_query_region_handler(stru
> > struct dlm_ctxt *dlm = NULL;
> > int status = 0;
> > int locked = 0;
> > + static u8 local[sizeof(qr->qr_regions)]; /* locked by dlm_domain_lock */
> >
> > qr = (struct dlm_query_region *) msg->buf;
> >
> > @@ -1112,7 +1105,7 @@ static int dlm_query_region_handler(stru
> > goto bail;
> > }
> >
> > - status = dlm_match_regions(dlm, qr);
> > + status = dlm_match_regions(dlm, qr, local);
> >
> > bail:
> > if (locked)
>
> That sizeof() is 1K. It maybe better if we moved the kmalloc() here.
That would work too. As it's only called at mount time, the
speed/space tradeoff favours kmalloc().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists