linux-kernel - Re: [Ocfs2-devel] fs/ocfs2/dlm: Use GFP_ATOMIC under spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110127174857.1f49cefc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:48:57 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Cc:	dsterba@...e.cz, mfasheh@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] fs/ocfs2/dlm: Use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock

On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:35:53 -0800 Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org> wrote:

> > --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c~a
> > +++ a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c
> > @@ -926,9 +926,9 @@ static int dlm_assert_joined_handler(str
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int dlm_match_regions(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
> > -			     struct dlm_query_region *qr)
> > +			     struct dlm_query_region *qr, u8 *local)
> >  {
> > -	char *local = NULL, *remote = qr->qr_regions;
> > +	char *remote = qr->qr_regions;
> 
> 	Won't the stack-depth busybodies hate us for this?  I realize we
> don't go much deeper from here, but it still is 1K of stack.

+	static u8 local[sizeof(qr->qr_regions)]; /* locked by dlm_domain_lock */
        ^^^^^^
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/