[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110128143912.66f60a22.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:39:12 +0900
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH 3/4] mecg: fix oom flag at THP charge
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:27:29 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks to Johanns and Daisuke for suggestion.
> =
> Hugepage allocation shouldn't trigger oom.
> Allocation failure is not fatal.
>
> Orignal-patch-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
IIUC, this patch isn't necessary because we don't go into oom
in "page_size > PAGE_SIZE" case after [2/4].
But I think it's not so bad to show explicitly that we don't cause oom in
THP charge.
Acked-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists