[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110128145035.d20af975.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:50:35 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH 3/4] mecg: fix oom flag at THP charge
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:39:12 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:27:29 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks to Johanns and Daisuke for suggestion.
> > =
> > Hugepage allocation shouldn't trigger oom.
> > Allocation failure is not fatal.
> >
> > Orignal-patch-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>
> IIUC, this patch isn't necessary because we don't go into oom
> in "page_size > PAGE_SIZE" case after [2/4].
> But I think it's not so bad to show explicitly that we don't cause oom in
> THP charge.
>
> Acked-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
>
Thank you for clarification.
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists