[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110131.150031.70194609.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:00:31 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: horms@...ge.net.au
Cc: randy.dunlap@...cle.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs)
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:57:28 +1100
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:18:47AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:41:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > Changes since 20110121:
>> > >
>> > > The net tree lost its build failure.
>> >
>> >
>> > When CONFIG_SYSCTL is not enabled:
>> >
>> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1891: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int'
>> > ERROR: "unregister_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined!
>> > ERROR: "register_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined!
>>
>> Thanks, I'm looking into it.
>
> On a related note, does IPVS need to handle the case
> where CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled?
Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists