[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m24o8o7k6o.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:00:31 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Tomas Winkler <tomasw@...il.com>
Cc: tapio.vihuri@...ia.com, ext Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Checkpatch problem with Kconfig help symbol ?
Tomas Winkler <tomasw@...il.com> writes:
>>
>> Yeah that is a little better. I do remind you that if the description
>> is good enough shorter than 4 lines then you can ignore checkpatch. It
>> is a style guide not a style enforcer. You are allowed to ignore things
>> if you can justify it.
>
> Please consider patch I've posted
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129647530611677&w=2
I originally didn't put in the number intentionally to make
it harder to game it. Most likely for a whole driver
or whole subsystems 4 lines are not enough to describe
it properly.
But yes if it's just for a debug feature you can ignore it.
But then most likely your debug feature shouldn't be
in Kconfig in the first place, but some runtime setting
(rule of thumb: if it controls less than 1KB of code it's
likely a bad idea in Kconfig)
And more complex debug features that do actually carry
significant code should have proper description.
I think a better change would be to describe this
more fully, not add the number.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists