[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110131080021.GI3070@secunet.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:00:21 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: flex_array related problems on selinux policy loading
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:57:29AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > >
> > > You have to check for and handle those allocation failures anyway.
> >
> > If we just return a pointer to the user that notifies that this was a
> > zerro size allocation, we would not need to allocate anything (like
> > kmalloc does), so we can't get allocation failures.
>
> Could you point me to some of this code? I'm having a hard time seeing
> how this is going to get used, and I don't see any use of
> ZERO_SIZE_PTR/ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR() outside of the sl*b code.
>
Perhaps I did not express it the right way, but
I did not say that this is used somewhere outside the sl*b code.
All I meant is that we return a pointer, like ZERO_SIZE_PTR
that notifies us that we have not allocated anything if a user
wants to access or to free data. This pointers are just for
internal usage of course.
Steffen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists