linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] rcupdate: remove dead code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110131075928.GD2145@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:59:28 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] rcupdate: remove dead code

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 06:25:48PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> 于 2011年01月30日 18:23, Amerigo Wang 写道:
> >DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD depends on PREEMPT, so #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> >is totally useless in kernel/rcupdate.c.
> 
> By "useless" I meant the code under #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD,
> of course. :)

Yep, I did interpret it that way.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/