lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:19:18 +0200
From:	Tapio Vihuri <tapio.vihuri@...ia.com>
To:	ext Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc:	ext Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Checkpatch problem with Kconfig help symbol ?

On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 10:17 +0000, ext Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:19:31AM +0200, Tapio Vihuri wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 10:38 +0100, ext Michal Marek wrote:
> > > On 20.1.2011 09:06, WANG Cong wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:42:48 +0200, Tapio Vihuri wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >> Hi
> > > >>
> > > >> Is this false positive ?
> > > >>
> > > >> WARNING: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol fully
> > > >> #60: FILE: drivers/input/misc/Kconfig:159: +       help
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Interesting enough, also:
> > > >>
> > > >> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --file drivers/input/misc/Kconfig WARNING:
> > > >> please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol fully #430:
> > > >> FILE: input/misc/Kconfig:430:
> > > >> +       help
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> But this is different line.
> > > >>
> > > > 
> > > > Seems yes, the Kconfig part of your patch looks fine.
> > > 
> > > The check is complaining that the help text is too short:
> > > 
> > > +config ECI_CTRL_DEBUG
> > > +	bool "ECI controller debug"
> > > +	depends on INPUT_ECI_AT20
> > > +	help
> > > +	  Say Y here to enable debugging messages for ECI controller driver.
> > > 
> > > Michal
> > 
> > Hi.
> > 
> > That I suspect, and I tried to add four lines more.
> > But it still complain the same.
> 
> If you have a patch which has four or more lines and trips this message
> it is false yes.  Please do send me your example, as my current tests
> pass.
> 
> -apw

Hi.

Sorry for the delay, I had made stupid email filter. Mea Culpa.

It's working OK. If there is only three lines of help, checkpatch will
complain.
With four lines, it's not.

I add more help in my case. It toggle driver debug on/off, so I try
harder to figure out how to say it with more words ;)

BR,
Tapio


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ