linux-kernel - Re: Checkpatch problem with Kconfig help symbol ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTi=0Gpvtvi8RyHbPAeh__YWLLPz+dE7iMdFbgGEW@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:15:10 +0200
From:	Tomas Winkler <tomasw@...il.com>
To:	tapio.vihuri@...ia.com
Cc:	ext Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
	ext Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Checkpatch problem with Kconfig help symbol ?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Tapio Vihuri <tapio.vihuri@...ia.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 10:17 +0000, ext Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:19:31AM +0200, Tapio Vihuri wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 10:38 +0100, ext Michal Marek wrote:
>> > > On 20.1.2011 09:06, WANG Cong wrote:
>> > > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:42:48 +0200, Tapio Vihuri wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Hi
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Is this false positive ?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> WARNING: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol fully
>> > > >> #60: FILE: drivers/input/misc/Kconfig:159: +       help
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Interesting enough, also:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --file drivers/input/misc/Kconfig WARNING:
>> > > >> please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol fully #430:
>> > > >> FILE: input/misc/Kconfig:430:
>> > > >> +       help
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> But this is different line.
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > Seems yes, the Kconfig part of your patch looks fine.
>> > >
>> > > The check is complaining that the help text is too short:
>> > >
>> > > +config ECI_CTRL_DEBUG
>> > > + bool "ECI controller debug"
>> > > + depends on INPUT_ECI_AT20
>> > > + help
>> > > +   Say Y here to enable debugging messages for ECI controller driver.
>> > >
>> > > Michal
>> >
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > That I suspect, and I tried to add four lines more.
>> > But it still complain the same.
>>
>> If you have a patch which has four or more lines and trips this message
>> it is false yes.  Please do send me your example, as my current tests
>> pass.
>>
>> -apw
>
> Hi.
>
> Sorry for the delay, I had made stupid email filter. Mea Culpa.
>
> It's working OK. If there is only three lines of help, checkpatch will
> complain.
> With four lines, it's not.
>
> I add more help in my case. It toggle driver debug on/off, so I try
> harder to figure out how to say it with more words ;)
>
> BR,
> Tapio
>

I believe that the warning is not descriptive enough, I also had to
look into the checkpatch script to
figure out what is going on.
What about adding little explanation like that:

WARNING: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol
fully (4 lines at least)

Thanks
Tomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/