[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110203092823.GB2570@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:28:23 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>, tytso@....edu, djwong@...ibm.com,
shli@...nel.org, neilb@...e.de, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kmannth@...ibm.com,
cmm@...ibm.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, rwheeler@...hat.com,
hch@....de, josef@...hat.com, jmoyer@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] block: skip elevator data initialization for
flush requests
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 05:55:49PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> @@ -808,9 +808,14 @@ static struct request *get_request(struc
> rl->count[is_sync]++;
> rl->starved[is_sync] = 0;
>
> - priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
> - if (priv)
> - rl->elvpriv++;
> + /*
> + * Only initialize elevator data if REQ_SORTED is set.
> + */
> + if (rw_flags & REQ_SORTED) {
> + priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
> + if (priv)
> + rl->elvpriv++;
> + }
This isn't enough. Now the allocated requests would have REQ_SORTED
set before going into elevator. You probably want to filter out
REQ_SORTED to elv_may_queue() too.
Also, it would be great if you update the comment on top of
get_request() to explain what @rw_flags does.
Thank you.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists