[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110203092855.GC1083@shutemov.name>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:28:55 +0200
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v3 2/2] cgroups: introduce timer slack subsystem
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 03:23:15PM -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Kirill A. Shutsemov
> <kirill@...temov.name> wrote:
> > From: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>
> >
> > Provides a way of tasks grouping by timer slack value. Introduces per
> > cgroup max and min timer slack value. When a task attaches to a cgroup,
> > its timer slack value adjusts (if needed) to fit min-max range.
> >
> > It also provides a way to set timer slack value for all tasks in the
> > cgroup at once.
> >
> > This functionality is useful in mobile devices where certain background
> > apps are attached to a cgroup and minimum wakeups are desired.
>
> If you really want to be able to make this modular,
Why not?
> I'd be inclined to
> make the check_timer_slack hook just default to NULL, rather than
> introducing dummy_timer_slack_check()
Good point.
> > +
> > +static int tslack_write_range(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct cftype *cft,
> > + u64 val)
> > +{
> > + struct timer_slack_cgroup *tslack_cgroup;
> > + struct cgroup_iter it;
> > + struct task_struct *task;
> > +
> > + if (!val)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + tslack_cgroup = cgroup_to_tslack_cgroup(cgroup);
> > + switch (cft->private) {
> > + case TIMER_SLACK_MIN:
> > + if (val > tslack_cgroup->max_slack_ns)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + tslack_cgroup->min_slack_ns = val;
> > + break;
> > + case TIMER_SLACK_MAX:
> > + if (val < tslack_cgroup->min_slack_ns)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + tslack_cgroup->max_slack_ns = val;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + BUG();
> > + }
> > +
>
> Don't we want to keep the min/max applied hierarchically as well? i.e.
> a child can't set its min/max outside the range of its parents?
Ok, I'll implement it.
> > +
> > +static int __init init_cgroup_timer_slack(void)
> > +{
> > + BUG_ON(timer_slack_check != dummy_timer_slack_check);
>
> Better to make this just fail the initialization if someone else has
> already claimed the hook, rather than crashing.
Ok.
Thanks, for reviewing.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists