[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=P+aoY4GY32xa8D8gHbDP73QpPmzvKbB4VM7g2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:55:52 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, mm: avoid stale tlb entries by clearing prev
mm_cpumask after switching mm
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Suresh Siddha
<suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> For the prev mm that is handing over the cpu to another mm, clear the cpu
> from the mm_cpumask(prev) after the cr3 is changed.
>
> Otherwise, clearing the mm_cpumask early will avoid the flush tlb IPI's while
> the cr3 and TLB's are still pointing to the prev mm. And this window can lead
> to the stale (global) TLB entries.
Why?
This looks pointless. Explain why this matters. Global entries are
never per-mm, so any global entries can never care about the
mm_cpumask.
And for any normal entries it doesn't matter if the IPI gets lost,
since the TLB will be flushed (immediately afterwards) by the cr3
write.
So no, I will not accept this patch, and it shouldn't be marked for
stable. Unless you can show exactly what is the point of it, and
exactly what the bug is.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists