[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201102031230.13759.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:30:13 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [BUG] broken ebba638ae723d8a8fc2f7abce5ec18b688b791d7
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:49:36 am Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:18:21 am H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 01/28/2011 08:58 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > On 01/27/2011 07:38 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > >> [Adding Jeremy]
> > >>
> > >> Jeremy, would this break Xen? As far as I know, Xen is the main user
> > >> of skipping segment register initialization.
> > >
> > > Xen doesn't go through head_*.S at all.
> > >
> >
> > OK, I guess it's actually lguest which needs this feature?
>
> Well, we already move __BOOT_DS into every other segment reg, so I don't think
> %ss will break...
>
> Checking...
Fine here.
Thanks,
Rusty.
PS. In general, I don't want lguest to interfere with cleanups: I'd rather
fix up lguest as required until it gets too hard, then kill it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists