| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 16:05:55 -0500 (EST)
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@...ellique.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-net@...r.kernel.org, Alan Piszcz <ap@...arrain.com>
Subject: Re: Supermicro X8DTH-6: Only ~250MiB/s from RAID<->RAID over
10GbE?
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:35:52 -0500 (EST) vous écriviez:
>
To respond to everyone:
> Did you try launching 4 simultaneous cp operations over nfs to get to
> 1.2 GB/s?
> I've witnessed single stream copy performance with Samba being less than
> maximum due to Samba limitations. Running multiple copy ops in parallel then
> usually saturates the pipe.
I tried 4 simultaenous cp's and there was little change, 250-320MiB/s.
Reader: 250MiB/s-300MiB/s
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st
0 6 0 927176 16076 2886308 0 0 206416 0 26850 40663 0 4 86 10 0
0 0 0 925620 16076 2887768 0 0 261620 0 31057 61111 0 6 86 8 0
0 0 0 923928 16076 2889016 0 0 328852 0 40954 102136 0 8 90 2 0
5 2 0 921112 16076 2890780 0 0 343476 0 39469 97957 0 8 90 2 0
Writer (its almost as if its caching the data and writing it out in
1.2-1.3Gbyte/sec chunks..
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st
7 0 232 13980 408 3746900 0 0 0 1351926 37877 81924 2 32 61 5 0
6 0 232 12740 404 3748308 0 0 0 1336768 38822 86505 2 31 62 5 0
4 0 232 12524 404 3744672 0 0 0 1295000 39368 91005 1 30 63 5 0
6 0 232 12304 404 3748148 0 0 0 1332776 39351 86929 2 31 62 5 0
I also noticed this: 'FS-Cache: Loaded'
Could this be slowing things down?
********* [Desktop test below]
When I copy on my desktop (Debian) systems, it transfers immediately:
0 0 9172 83648 2822716 3343120 0 0 52 320 4249 3682 2 1 97 0
0 0 9172 86532 2822716 3343176 0 0 0 0 4362 3074 0 1 99 0
0 4 9172 62924 2822716 3363572 0 0 94212 0 5083 3044 1 3 90 7
1 7 9172 63444 2822708 3364008 0 0 360448 32 19058 8825 0 15 48 37
0 5 9172 61828 2821692 3367004 0 0 491520 0 26283 15282 0 24 43 32
0 5 9172 59212 2821672 3373292 0 0 524288 0 28810 17370 0 27 33 40
3 6 9172 57620 2821660 3355500 0 0 469364 128 25399 15825 0 21 42 36
********* [End of desktop test]
When I transfer using CentOS 5.5, there are a bunch of little reads, then it
averages out at around 250MiB/s:
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st
0 0 0 871088 16108 2942808 0 0 4091 3 552 1165 0 2 96 2 0
0 0 0 871088 16108 2942808 0 0 0 0 1013 2342 0 0 100 0 0
0 0 0 871224 16108 2942808 0 0 0 0 1031 2375 0 0 100 0 0
0 8 0 870864 16108 2942808 0 0 288 0 1071 2396 0 0 86 14 0
2 0 0 868636 16108 2943256 0 0 160 0 6348 18642 0 0 80 19 0
0 0 0 868884 16116 2943248 0 0 0 28 31717 99894 0 4 96 0 0
1 0 0 467040 16116 3343524 0 0 401444 0 40241 105777 0 4 93 4 0
2 1 0 12300 8540 3802792 0 0 482668 0 44694 116988 0 6 88 6 0
1 0 0 12412 3528 3805056 0 0 480124 0 44765 112272 0 6 88 6 0
0 8 0 17560 3528 3798900 0 0 388288 0 37987 68367 0 5 85 10 0
1 7 0 17868 3528 3802172 0 0 323296 0 33470 38398 0 5 83 11 0
1 7 0 17260 3524 3801688 0 0 299584 0 30991 35153 0 5 83 11 0
0 8 0 17272 3512 3802208 0 0 304352 0 31463 35400 0 5 84 11 0
0 8 0 17228 3512 3801476 0 0 258816 0 27035 30651 0 4 84 1
Is there a way to disable the VFS/page cache some how to avoid whatever
FS-Cache is doing?
> Ok, could you do the following:
> dd if=/dev/urandom of=hugefile bs=1M count=<c>
> Where <c> is chosen so the resulting file is 2-3 times the RAM available
> in your server.
> Then redo the dd to null. Let's also check with the rsize from the nfs.
> /usr/bin/time -v dd if=hugefile of=/dev/null bs=<rsize used by NFS>
I also have tried rsize/wsize of 65536 with NFS, no difference there, rsize
and wsize back the default, 8192 I believe.
221M hugefile
223M hugefile
226M hugefile
229M hugefile
232M hugefile
Had to skip urandom, too slow (7MiB/s or so)..
# dd if=/dev/zero of=hugefile bs=1M count=16384
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
17179869184 bytes (17 GB) copied, 14.6305 seconds, 1.2 GB/s
# /usr/bin/time -v dd if=hugefile of=/dev/null bs=8192
2097152+0 records in
2097152+0 records out
17179869184 bytes (17 GB) copied, 14.7656 seconds, 1.2 GB/s
Command being timed: "dd if=hugefile of=/dev/null bs=8192"
User time (seconds): 2.45
System time (seconds): 8.70
Percent of CPU this job got: 75%
Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 0:14.76
Average shared text size (kbytes): 0
Average unshared data size (kbytes): 0
Average stack size (kbytes): 0
Average total size (kbytes): 0
Maximum resident set size (kbytes): 0
Average resident set size (kbytes): 0
Major (requiring I/O) page faults: 2
Minor (reclaiming a frame) page faults: 216
Voluntary context switches: 57753
Involuntary context switches: 1843
Swaps: 0
File system inputs: 0
File system outputs: 0
Socket messages sent: 0
Socket messages received: 0
Signals delivered: 0
Page size (bytes): 4096
Exit status: 0
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st
0 1 0 17100 432 3758476 0 0 4607 1147 575 1051 0 2 95 3 0
1 0 0 16980 432 3758888 0 0 1064760 0 9344 10698 1 4 94 1 0
1 0 0 17100 432 3758888 0 0 1081808 0 9520 10608 1 4 94 1 0
1 1 0 16912 440 3758908 0 0 1136764 48 9899 11305 1 4 94 1 0
1 0 0 16972 440 3758908 0 0 1112664 0 9756 11126 1 4 94 1 0
1 0 0 17080 440 3759040 0 0 1140564 0 9943 11492 1 4 94 1 0
2 0 0 16976 440 3759040 0 0 1134020 0 9910 11475 1 4 94 1 0
1 0 0 17364 440 3758940 0 0 1132380 0 9865 11236 1 4 94
Justin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists