[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110205220621.GB17347@gallifrey>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 22:06:21 +0000
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@...ellique.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-net@...r.kernel.org, Alan Piszcz <ap@...arrain.com>
Subject: Re: Supermicro X8DTH-6: Only ~250MiB/s from RAID<->RAID over 10GbE?
* Justin Piszcz (jpiszcz@...idpixels.com) wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2011, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
>
>> Le Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:35:52 -0500 (EST) vous écriviez:
>>
>
> To respond to everyone:
>
>> Did you try launching 4 simultaneous cp operations over nfs to get to
>> 1.2 GB/s?
>> I've witnessed single stream copy performance with Samba being less than
>> maximum due to Samba limitations. Running multiple copy ops in parallel then
>> usually saturates the pipe.
>
>
> I tried 4 simultaenous cp's and there was little change, 250-320MiB/s.
So I think you've said network benchmarks are OK, disc benchmarks are OK, but
a copy over the network is slow.
What happens if you run a disc benchmark at the same time as a network benchmark;
even though the two aren't related? Can you keep the disc busy writing even when
the network is being pushed?
Dave
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists