linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for February 3 (netfilter)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 09 Feb 2011 07:51:44 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 3 (netfilter)

On 02/08/11 23:21, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Am 04.02.2011 20:15, schrieb Randy Dunlap:
>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:00:34 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20110202:
>>
>> When SYSCTL and PROC_FS and NETFILTER_NETLINK are not enabled:
>>
>> net/built-in.o: In function `try_to_load_type':
>> ip_set_core.c:(.text+0x3ab49): undefined reference to `nfnl_unlock'
>> ip_set_core.c:(.text+0x3ab4e): undefined reference to `nfnl_lock'
> 
> Does this patch fix the problem?

Yes, it does.  Thanks.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>

-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/