[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D524079.1000908@trash.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 08:21:29 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 3 (netfilter)
Am 04.02.2011 20:15, schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:00:34 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20110202:
>
> When SYSCTL and PROC_FS and NETFILTER_NETLINK are not enabled:
>
> net/built-in.o: In function `try_to_load_type':
> ip_set_core.c:(.text+0x3ab49): undefined reference to `nfnl_unlock'
> ip_set_core.c:(.text+0x3ab4e): undefined reference to `nfnl_lock'
Does this patch fix the problem?
View attachment "x" of type "text/plain" (425 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists