[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102101319440.31804@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:22:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@....ibm.com>
cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-two tree with the tip tree
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xen-two tree got a conflict in
> kernel/irq/manage.c between commit
> dc5f219e88294b93009eef946251251ffffb6d60 ("genirq: Add
> IRQF_FORCE_RESUME") from the tip tree and commit
> c6c5596743c2a333a8e31b0247f44cd367484a5e ("genirq: Add
> IRQF_FORCE_RESUME") from the xen-two tree.
>
> Despite having the same Author time stamps, these commits are not quite the
> same. I used the version from the tip tree which kept the line:
>
> desc->status &= ~IRQ_SUSPENDED;
That's the correct one. I fear I messed up, when I gave xen folks the
git url to pull from. I had the first version pushed out, and zapped
right away when I noticed the missing line. Then fixed it and
repushed. I should have checked git://..... which obviously had
already picked up the borked one and did not pick up the correct one
before xen folks pulled. Sorry about that.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists