[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D5426A9.60903@mvista.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:55:53 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
CC: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/20] pata_efar: always program master_data before slave_data
Hello.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> On 08-02-2011 15:24, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> [...]
>>> We may need to set SITRE before programming slave_data.
>>> This makes pata_efar match the behavior of IDE's slc90e66 host driver
>>> and also of libata's ata_piix one.
>>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz<bzolnier@...il.com>
>> [...]
>>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_efar.c b/drivers/ata/pata_efar.c
>>> index 1e2ff7d..7f564d7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_efar.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_efar.c
>>> @@ -74,10 +74,12 @@ static void efar_set_timings(struct ata_port *ap,
>>> struct ata_device *adev,
>>> u8 pio, bool use_mwdma)
>>> {
>>> struct pci_dev *dev = to_pci_dev(ap->host->dev);
>>> + unsigned int is_slave = (adev->devno != 0);
>> What's the point of this variable? To save one pointer dereference? :-)
> Make code more similar to ata_piix.c and thus easier for comparisons
> through 'diff -ub'.
> In reality it doesn't matter now that much as pata_efar (same for
> pata_oldpiix) vanishes completely at the end of the patch series.. :-)
Yeah, I understood that. Just don't have time to review the full series yet.
> Thanks,
> Bartlomiej
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists