[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinE5x=hmQ6Oykw3Tb38HVeL5eHxjdnPOdMt930q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:25:53 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/20] pata_efar: always program master_data before slave_data
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 08-02-2011 16:25, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>>>>> We may need to set SITRE before programming slave_data.
>
>>>> Do you have a documentation cite for this or is it random fiddling with
>>>> a
>>>> driver you can't test ?
>
>>> It is good to enable SITRE register before programming it and all
>>> Intel controllers
>
>> That sounds like someone quoting religion. Documentation cite please.
>
> SLC90E66 datasheet only says that SIDETIM register has no effect without
> SITRE bit set.
Alan, is this explanation sufficient to ACK this patch? (Thanks
Sergei for digging it out.)
Jeff, would it be possible to queue patches #01-15 for 2.6.39 if there
are no further concerns with them (thus leaving the merging of
PIIX-like drivers for later)? They got additional testing on ICH4 and
they look mostly safe & straight-forward compared to #16-21.
Thanks,
Bartlomiej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists