[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110211095218.GQ3770@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:52:18 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 02:58:10PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S between commit
> 94d1ac8b55799be10487fff9766cce6d6628462a ("x86: Reduce back the alignment
> of the per-CPU data section") from the tip tree and commit
> 19df0c2fef010e94e90df514aaf4e73f6b80145c ("percpu: align percpu
> readmostly subsection to cacheline") from the percpu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Thanks. Looks good to me.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists