[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110211145810.bdea73a3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:58:10 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S between commit
94d1ac8b55799be10487fff9766cce6d6628462a ("x86: Reduce back the alignment
of the per-CPU data section") from the tip tree and commit
19df0c2fef010e94e90df514aaf4e73f6b80145c ("percpu: align percpu
readmostly subsection to cacheline") from the percpu tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index e9f7a3c,cef446f..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@@ -305,7 -305,7 +305,7 @@@ SECTION
}
#if !defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || !defined(CONFIG_SMP)
- PERCPU(PAGE_SIZE)
- PERCPU(INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES, THREAD_SIZE)
++ PERCPU(INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES, PAGE_SIZE)
#endif
. = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists