[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110211130412.GA2591@scooter>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:04:12 +0100
From: Felix Blanke <felixblanke@...il.com>
To: Chris Samuel <chris@...muel.org>,
Felix Blanke <felixblanke@...il.com>, kreijack@...ind.it,
Hugo Mills <hugo-lkml@...fax.org.uk>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LOOP_GET_STATUS(64) truncates pathnames to 64 chars (was Re: Bug
in mkfs.btrfs?!)
Hi,
are you sure that patch is in the kernel?
I'm using 2.6.37 and don't have those attribues in my /sys.
Felix
On 10. February 2011 - 13:29, Petr Uzel wrote:
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:29:27 +0100
> From: Petr Uzel <petr.uzel@...e.cz>
> To: Chris Samuel <chris@...muel.org>
> Cc: Felix Blanke <felixblanke@...il.com>, kreijack@...ind.it, Hugo Mills
> <hugo-lkml@...fax.org.uk>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, Linux Kernel
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: LOOP_GET_STATUS(64) truncates pathnames to 64 chars (was Re:
> Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!)
> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Samuel <chris@...muel.org>, Felix Blanke
> <felixblanke@...il.com>, kreijack@...ind.it, Hugo Mills
> <hugo-lkml@...fax.org.uk>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, Linux Kernel
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:15:11AM +1100, Chris Samuel wrote:
> > /*
> > * CC'd to linux-kernel in case they have any feedback on this.
> > *
> > * Long thread, trying to work out why mkfs.btrfs failed to
> > * make a filesystem on an encrypted loopback mount called
> > * /dev/loop2. Cause turned out to be mkfs.btrfs calling
> > * LOOP_GET_STATUS to find out if the block device was mounted
> > * and getting a truncated device name back and so it later
> > * fails when lstat() is called on the truncated device path.
> > *
> > * The long device name for the encrypted loopback mount was
> > * because /dev/disk/by-id/$ID was used when Felix created it
> > * to cope with devices moving around.
> > */
> >
> > On 25/01/11 00:01, Felix Blanke wrote:
> >
> > > you were talking about the LOOP_GET_STATUS function. I'm not
> > > quite sure where does it came from. Is it part of the kernel?
> > > Or does it come from the util-linux package?
> >
> > It's in the kernel, and there is both LOOP_GET_STATUS (old
> > implementation) and LOOP_GET_STATUS64 (new implementation).
> >
> > They return structures called loop_info and loop_info64
> > respectively and both are defined in include/linux/loop.h .
> >
> > Sadly in both cases the lengths of paths are defined to be
> > LO_NAME_SIZE which is currently 64 and hence either
> > implementation will cause the problematic:
> >
> > lstat("/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par",
> > 0x7fffa30b3cf0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> >
> > I've CC'd this to the LKML in case they have any feedback on
> > this apparent problem with the API.
>
> Since 2.6.37, you can get full path to the backing file from sys:
> cat /sys/block/loopX/loop/backing_file
>
> See
> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2010-07/msg10996.html
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Petr
>
> --
> Petr Uzel
> IRC: ptr_uzl @ freenode
---end quoted text---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists