[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297452814.4967.110.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:33:34 -0600
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
mark gross <markgross@...gnar.org>,
David Alan Gilbert <linux@...blig.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len <len.brown@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] idle governor: Avoid lock acquisition to read pm_qos
before entering idle
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 11:27 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 20:22 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks, but I'd put that comment before the structure definition with the
> > "NOTE:" prefix and I think you should explain the reason why that field
> > shouldn't be changed to 64-bits.
> >
>
> Either you or James want to suggest a comment on why the field shouldn't
> be changed to 64-bits to be placed there?
/*
* Note: The lockless read read path depends on the CPU accessing
* target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU
* types linux supports for 32 bit quantites
*/
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists