Message-ID: <20110211031927.GA884@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:19:27 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>,
	Robert Lippert <rlippert@...gle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SMBIOS / DMI Event Logs in Linux?

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 06:19:47PM -0800, Mike Waychison wrote:
> On 02/10/11 17:25, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 03:18:14PM -0800, Mike Waychison wrote:
> >>Hey guys,
> >>
> >>I need some guidance. Do either of you know of any attempts to have
> >>the kernel decode and display/interact with DMI type 15: System
> >>Event Log?
> >
> >I don't have any experience in this area, but I do have one comment on
> >your proposal below:
> >
> >>The event log I'm dealing with while cleaning up the "gsmi" driver
> >>interacts with a log that is modeled after the System Event Log.
> >>I'm wondering if there is any precedent for a clean way to expose
> >>the event log, I'd like to use it (replacing the ioctls from my
> >>earlier patch series send-out).
> >>
> >>FYI, we use OEM specific headers and descriptors, which probably
> >>doesn't help.
> >>
> >>Do most folks that need access to this data rely on /dev/mem and
> >>dmidecode?  I'd like to avoid going that route if possible.
> >>
> >>Lacking any better ideas though, I was thinking of something along
> >>the lines of the following:
> >>
> >>
> >>$ cat /sys/firmware/gsmi/eventlog
> >><offset>  <boot number>  <recorded time>  <quoted reason>  <optional data>
> >>...
> >>
> >>with a single event log entry per line.
> >>   <offset>  would be the record number,
> >>   <boot number>  is the recorded boot number
> >>   <recorded time>  comes from each record,
> >>   <quoted reason>  is the English translation of Event Log Types from
> >>the DMTF standard + vendor extended types we use.
> >>   <optional data>  is space separated values associated with<quoted reason>
> >
> >Ick, no, remember, sysfs is "one value per file".  doing even a single
> >line like you describe here isn't ok, not to mention a huge buffer of
> >these lines.
> >
> >And no, a "binary" sysfs file is not ok either.
> 
> Works fine for the /sys/firmware/efi stuff.

Do any of those files have multiple lines?  I don't have a system here
that has that directory.

> Works well enough for /sys/firmware/acpi too.

Those all look to be "one value per file" as well.

I don't see any long logs in these firmware types, or am I missing
something?

> >Now your idea for such a log file is fine, I'm not saying that's not ok,
> >or acceptable, just don't put it in sysfs, sorry.  Try using the ring
> >buffer framework from the tracing code perhaps?
> >
> >Or use debugfs?  Or make a 'firmwarefs'?  I can easily knock that
> >together if you need it.
> 
> Are you seriously asking for another filesystem?

What's to be afraid of another filesystem?  It's only 250 lines of code,
and trivial to create.

Remember, sysfs almost was a filesystem-per-device implementation, as
our superblock and mounting logic is very nice and easy to handle all
race conditions.  I objected to that as it would be a bit unwieldy for
some filesystem mount lists, but the idea is still quite sane and
reasonable.

And also, a filesystem-per-type is just fine.  It uniquely keeps things
separate, and defines interfaces properly.

> I don't get why you're holding me to these standards that that are
> totally missed by these same subsystems that you maintain.

I do not see any files in the subsystems I maintain that have multiple
values per lines, and have multiple lines, in sysfs files.  What have I
missed that you are noticing?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists